Saturday, April 23, 2016

Weekly Mail April 17, 2016


    So we go to the polls in NY on Tuesday in what I keep hearing is the first NY Primary that means anything in years. It's true that this is the first one with any real buzz, probably since Bill Clinton vs. Jerry Brown in 1992. However NY participated in Super Tuesday in 2000, 2004 and 2008, so the nominees were not yet decided in those years. The reality is, this is the first time NY has had the stage to itself and the nominations not been sewn up since 1992. Any way you slice it, it's an exciting time.
       I realize many people think that between the ugliness of Trump vs. Cruz vs. Kasich, and the yelling and screaming between Hillary and Bernie, much of the excitement is tempered. But I say the fact that people are so engaged one way or another is a good thing. No, I don't think riots and fighting between protesters and supporters is a good thing, but the turnout has been enormous, and I do believe the more of us involved in the process, the better.
       Usually the way it works here at Weekly Mail is that rather than out and out endorsing a candidate, I give you a tons of reasons why not to vote for the other person running. In other words I do non-endorsements. Think I'm going to change that up a bit for this cycle.
        Just a reminder, I'm a registered Republican, I had been an independent, but switched after I got married and moved to Manhattan, mainly in anticipation of supporting John McCain. Anyone who read last weeks blog post knows that when I went to cast my vote for McCain in 2008, I was put into a Democrat voting booth and had neither the time or the inclination to explain to the morons at the polling site that I was in the wrong booth. I simply cast my vote for hope and change, and got the hell out of there.
        I should have better luck on Tuesday, and assuming I get the correct ballot, I'll be casting my vote for John Kasich of Ohio. But first my non endorsements...
Ted Cruz-Texas- Where to start with Lying Ted.... Well how about here, of all the candidates running in BOTH parties, he's the one who cares about NY the least. In fact, he's one of those people that can't stand NY. Ted Cruz, is the John Rocker of politics.
       No, he didn't come out and bash us 7 train riders, (when Rocker spouted his infamous spew, I was a daily 7 train rider) but he did vote down the Zadroga Act for 9/11 first responders, voted against funding for Super Storm Sandy, and in Rocker like fashion, deplored NY values. Pandering to rednecks to win a national election is just cheap. Cruz probably figured he wouldn't be in a position where he would need NY support to win the nomination. To be honest? Neither did I.
        Cruz would be the first Generation X President, which is something I should embrace. But in reality, that's the only thing he's got going for him. I also don't like the fact that he was born in Canada, (though I believe if he hasn't been disqualified for that already, he shouldn't be disqualified for that now.) I just find the man very shady. He's got a thing against NY, I've got a thing against politicians from Texas. The last time we had one as President, the economy ended up in the toilet, we were put into a war with not enough of a plan to secure the peace, and the price of gas shot up as did unemployment. People are always saying I defended the man too much. Maybe I did. People say I don't give his successor enough credit, maybe I don't. I have my reasons (and rebuttals) for both statements, but I'll say this here though. We don't need a return to that time in the country.
       And I think that's where we'd be headed in a Ted Cruz presidency. A bigger wage gap than we have now, tax breaks for big oil, and screwing over the middle class at every opportunity. Of the 5 people still running, Cruz is the last one I want to see marching down Pennsylvania Avenue on January 20.
       
Donald Trump-NY- Now in fairness to Rocker, er I mean Cruz, part of the reason he's so anti-NY is that the man he is chasing for the nomination, is a New Yorker. Trump, he of the three marriages and two divorces, is the type of New Yorker Cruz wants to bash.
    When I told Weekly Mail co-editor Karl (The Ace) Ludwig that I would consider voting for Trump, he literally shuttered. I had to quickly explain that Trump wasn't my first choice, he just wasn't my last choice.
      And I have to be honest, the more folks tell me I can't vote for Trump, the more inclined I am to do just that. The Daily News, whose Trump bashing has gone from the ridiculous to the sublime, has become a joke. A few weeks ago, they breathlessly reported that Chris Brown was bashing Trump. Yes, the same Chris Brown who used Rihanna as a punching bag, was not going to support Trump, no doubt because of his mistreatment of women.
         But I have to put that aside and focus on what's important, and to me, that is the fact that I haven't heard enough from Trump to make me think he can make a difference here. He is constantly talking about the polls and how he is winning, to the point where I wonder if he's going to realize that on January 20th, he is actually going to have to run the country. Part of me thinks if he wins, he's going to spend the following two months partying in Boca Raton as if he just led the Mets to the World Series title.
          The sad thing is, I think he's got the smarts and the work ethic to do a good job. I don't buy the notion that he has all his money because of his father. I think he has built some successful companies, and done so really positive things. Too often during this cycle though, he has allowed his rhetoric to overshadow his accomplishments. There is a pro-trump video on Facebook that I saw, where a number of years ago on a talk show, someone asked him "where does an average person like me start if they want to become successful."  He answered by saying the first thing you have to do is not refer to yourself as average. If he could get THAT message out, instead of bashing his opponents, and mocking John McCain's military service, he could win this going away.
          But instead, he's become almost a sideshow. But a sideshow that is quite close to being the Republican nominee for President. Maybe he wins NY going away, and tells the world about it. I won't be casting the vote to make that happen.
John Kasich-Ohio. Is he a perfect candidate? No. Will liberals embrace him? No, they're going to vote for Hillary or Bernie. I don't know if he'll unite the country, I doubt it.
        But I still think Kasich is a good man. I still think he has more of a heart than either Cruz or Trump, I think he cares about the country and it's well being. I think his immigration plan is fair, and his message is positive (for the most part). Maybe I'm biased because he worked for Fox News around the time I was working at the Post more often.
        Mostly, I think I like him because he didn't rag on anyone's wife, comment on anyone's appearance, speculate over the size of one's unmentionables, and generally didn't make an a$$ out of himself.  Is that enough to vote him into the Oval Office,
This year it is.
I can't cast a vote in the Democratic Primary (unless they screw it up like they did on the UES in 2008) but if I could, I would vote for Bernie Sanders. I don't know what the hell he would do if we were ever attacked again, People say Trump has no foreign policy, but Trump has something resembling a foreign policy, Bernie has nothing. And I can't imagine too many of his economic and social plans coming to fruition.
But I wouldn't mind seeing him try. And his tries will leave the country better off than perhaps any of the other candidates, especially his opponent in the primary. That he is still in this fight this late in the game is both a testament to his message and that of Hillary Clinton. I'll leave that right there.
SPORTS NHL Playoffs:
I was hoping for the Rangers to get out of Pittsburgh with a split, and after their hard fought 4-2 victory Saturday, they got it. Can they pull off a series win? Well, they're capable as evidenced by the win, but this isn't last year's Penguins, or last year's Rangers. To me, the key to this series is making sure coach Alain Vigneault plays Dylan McIllrath and Brady Skjei on defense. McIllrath is aggressive and can make life difficult for the Pens scorers. Skjei is young with excellent skating ability and an improving puck handling. I love Dan Girardi, but he's an old 31, and Dan Boyle is just old. Once Ryan McDonagh comes back, I'd sit Boyle and Girardi and play the youngsters. I just think that would be the best way to put away the Penguins.
The Islanders also split their first two games against the Florida Panthers. I think this might be the year they break their long playoff series drought. They have the scoring and the grit, question is do they have the defense and the goaltending?
NEWS ITEM: Mike Piazza Jersey Controversy
On September 21st 2001, my father had decided that we should all go to the Met game that night. It was going to be the first live sporting event in New York City after the September 11th attacks.
I didn't think it was a great idea to be honest with you. They were telling us that security was going to be so much extra tight that night. They were saying that it was going to take close to an hour from the time you got to the stadium until you got to your seat. I also figured the game might be sold out.
It ends up that it wasn't sold out. But I can tell you that I very rarely heard the stadium rock as loud as it locked at night. I can also tell you that of all the decisions I've made in my life this will rank up there with one of the best. As the years have gone on the significance of that game has only increased.
And when Mike Piazza hit his home run off of Braves pitcher Steve Karsay, it would go down as one of the most significant home runs in Mets history if not New York baseball history. A great moment for our city a great moment for our nation.
The jersey that Piazza wore that night was apparently sold by the Met organization and put up for auction. Fred and Jeff Wilpon will apparently do anything for money, and have absolutely no shame.
Thankfully some well-to-do at fans for the jersey at the auction and are planning to donate it to the 911 Memorial Museum, and the Baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown New York. So this story which could have gone really bad will apparently have a happy ending.
Regardless of who you are supporting please make sure you get out and vote on Tuesday.
Have a great week.

7 comments:

  1. Billy Boy-As I'm sure you know, I'm not sold on Donald Trump's "smarts" or his "work ethic." From what I've read it seems like he'd have more money today if he just invested daddy's dough in the S&P way back in that groovy time known as the 70's:

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/09/03/if-donald-trump-followed-this-really-basic-advice-hed-be-a-lot-richer/

    So, if you don't mind me asking: what exactly has he done or what have you read that makes you believe he's a smart, hard-working dude and that: "he has built some successful companies, and done so really positive things."

    As one of my trusted interpreters of the news, I'd really like to get a more in depth analysis from you.

    And I'm in total agreement with you about the Wilpons. They are just awful. I don't know how they sleep at night.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, I could tell you about how he took over and completed the Wollman skating rink from corrupt New York contractors, but you would dismiss that as no big deal. I could tell you about the casinos he built, but you would tell me they all went into bankruptcy. I could tell you about the golf courses, but you would ask "What does golf courses have to do with running a country?" I could ask if the man is such a f-ckup, how is he a still a billionaire several times over? I'll save my breath, and post this video. That will be my answer.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKOQdcVoRys

      And yes the Wilpons are scumbags. As is James Dolan.

      Delete
    2. I know you're not going to believe me but I asked for your take with an open mind and was very eager to hear if there was something about Trump that I missed.

      My memory is not what it used to be but I don't recall ever calling Trump a f-ckup. Like you, I figured that he's got tons of dough so he must be doing something right. But the article that I pointed you to seemed to question that logic. Which is why I asked you for your take.

      If you feel like you're wasting your breath, you can feel free to not answer me. I've only been engaging you on these things because I thought you enjoyed discussing this stuff. If you don't, that's cool. I will keep my questions to myself.

      Delete
    3. There is no need to keep your opinion to yourself, I would never tell you to do that. And no, you didn't call him a f-ckup
      However, back in December when you guys asked me if I would consider voting for Trump, and I said "I would over Hillary or Ted Cruz," you guys looked at me as if I was nuts. (The fact that I am nuts notwithstanding)
      Somebody I work with said to me the other day "You know, I'd like to vote for Trump, but I'm afraid people will think I'm a bad person if i do." I kind of know where they were coming from, and again, he's not even my first choice.
      Getting back to your point, I would never want you to keep your opinion to yourself and I do apologize if I it came off that way. Sometimes things end up on paper look harsher than it was coming out of my brain. I'd like it if more folks responded and we could have a real dialogue. Ray and I got into it on FB the other night about Hillary and a couple of people jumped in to rip her (both of them female BTW) Pleae keep reading, please keep writing and please help make America great again! (Just kidding on the last part)

      Delete
    4. Hey Bill-I'm glad to hear that you don't mind hearing my 2 cents. And you're definitely right-about one thing at least ;) - tone is hard to convey in writing and can easily be misinterpreted. So forgive me for being overly sensitive and know that no matter how it may seem like I'm being a pr!ck, I'm really not. I truly value your opinion and I miss our spirited debates on these topics.

      Now to address the point you made about our meeting in December: You are right. I did then and do now think it's a bit nutty to support Trump. You, however, are not nuts. You're a thoughtful, intelligent and well informed guy. And if you honestly believe that he could make a decent president, I'm willing to hear what you have to say. Truth be told there's practically no way your going to convince me to vote for him, but this man may be our next president. And that scares me. I mean, have you read the transcript of his interview with the Washington Post Editorial Board? Here it is in case you missed it:

      https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2016/03/21/a-transcript-of-donald-trumps-meeting-with-the-washington-post-editorial-board/

      I'd like someone to un-scare me. Please convince me that a Trump presidency will not make me nostalgic for those good ol' George W years.

      Delete
    5. I wish I could say something that would un-scare you, but I don't think I can. I think we're pretty much screwed either way. I remember way back when in 1992 when Ross Perot was kind of/sort of running for President, and my beef with him was that he wasn't specific on any of his plans. Trump makes Perot look like a model of specifics. The only thing we can do is sit back and enjoy the fireworks, because that's about all the entertainment we are going to have for a while.

      Delete
  2. I'm a little disappointed. I was really hoping for a reasoned and factually supported case for why Trump would make a better choice than Clinton? Is it possible that the case can't be made? That as uninspiring as Clinton is that she's the lesser of the two evils?

    ReplyDelete